BCS Rankings

[Lkr]

1. Oregon

2. Auburn

3. TCU(larger margin over Boise St. Frogs lead in both polls)

4. Boise State

5. LSU(surprise to me! highest ranked 1 loss team)

6. Stanford(highest position ever)

7. Wisconsin

8. Nebraska

9. Ohio State

10. Oklahoma State

[Cobb]

Still think TCU should be higher.

[Guest The REAL STL10]

TCU=1

Auburn=2

 

^ IMO

[Cobb]

TCU=1

Auburn=2

 

^ IMO

Auburn over Oregon? :o

[Flash]

AU and Oregon should be 1 and 2 respectively.

[Lkr]

TCU=1

Auburn=2

 

^ IMO

LMAO joke post I hope. Otherwise, you are just as clueless about football(especially the college games) as your posts indicate

[Jenneral]

Glad to see WI movin up week after week.

[Lone Wolf]

Boise St. fans are complaining that they were pushed back 2 spots. You really can't complain how TCU dominated a pretty good Utah (were undefeated before the game?) team.

[Flash]

Boise St. fans are complaining that they were pushed back 2 spots. You really can't complain how TCU dominated a pretty good Utah (were undefeated before the game?) team.

 

If Boise would play a real OOC schedule then we wouldn't be talking about them being pushed back. They need to play at least 3 top 20 teams in order to be taken seriously because their conference is so horrible.

[OSUBucksfan09]

Though I may agree Flash TCU has a decent schedule at least and to be honest there defense is damn good.

I could see them competing in the NC, against Auburn or Oregon though I would see them losing but not by more then 10.

Then again I think Auburn isn't the real deal and Oregon is so, we shall see.

[Lone Wolf]

If Boise would play a real OOC schedule then we wouldn't be talking about them being pushed back. They need to play at least 3 top 20 teams in order to be taken seriously because their conference is so horrible.

Yeah, I agree. I think it would be nice if they could move to a tougher division for football.

[Lkr]

If Boise would play a real OOC schedule then we wouldn't be talking about them being pushed back. They need to play at least 3 top 20 teams in order to be taken seriously because their conference is so horrible.

If teams would accept a matchup, it would help, but no

[Lkr]

If Boise would play a real OOC schedule then we wouldn't be talking about them being pushed back. They need to play at least 3 top 20 teams in order to be taken seriously because their conference is so horrible.

If teams would accept a matchup, it would help, but no

[Flash]

If teams would accept a matchup, it would help, but no

 

Its the other way around with them. This year is proof enough. VT and OSU took them on. They just didn't schedule 2 very good teams there. Had they gone away from the smurf turf and played an SEC opponent then maybe a couple Pac10 teams I would take them more seriously.

[Flash]

Though I may agree Flash TCU has a decent schedule at least and to be honest there defense is damn good.

I could see them competing in the NC, against Auburn or Oregon though I would see them losing but not by more then 10.

Then again I think Auburn isn't the real deal and Oregon is so, we shall see.

 

TCU has definitely played a better schedule. And yea I'd give anything to have that staff coaching up the talent down here. We'd be instant contenders.

[The Great iBoldin]

If teams would accept a matchup, it would help, but no

 

That's been proven otherwise. I used to be in the same boat as you, but I didn't a little more research and found that's simply untrue.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4623676

 

Here is one link.

[Lkr]

Its the other way around with them. This year is proof enough. VT and OSU took them on. They just didn't schedule 2 very good teams there. Had they gone away from the smurf turf and played an SEC opponent then maybe a couple Pac10 teams I would take them more seriously.

They've played Oregon and Oregon St over the past few years(both teams twice iirc). Part of the problem scheduling Pac10 teams from what I've seen is the Pac10 teams tend to favor scheduling Big10 teams.

[Lkr]

That's been proven otherwise. I used to be in the same boat as you, but I didn't a little more research and found that's simply untrue.

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4623676

 

Here is one link.

I don't understand how that link relates to scheduling