ChosenOne Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 (edited) Make your pick and explain why. Edited December 20, 2009 by ChosenOne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 ^Woo, lets compare a team that sucked last year(Packers), to a team thats been elite in the regular season before December(Cowgirls).Dallas was ranked 8th in total defense last year, btw Romo has had Owens, Witten, Williams, and now Austin. Jennings has been [expletive] this year Dallas was 20th in points allowed last year Packers were 22nd so Romo had to do just as much scoring as Rodgers Rodgers had Jennings > OwensDriver > WilliamsNelson is supposed to be as good as Austin thats why he was taken so highly in the 2nd round he just isnt utilized and Donald Lee and Jermichael Finley who are two good TE's Romo 36-17 Rodgers 15-14 enough said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand New Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Spell Aaron right and I'll make my decision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly3rs18 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Dallas was 20th in points allowed last year Packers were 22nd so Romo had to do just as much scoring as Rodgers Rodgers had Jennings > OwensDriver > WilliamsNelson is supposed to be as good as Austin thats why he was taken so highly in the 2nd round he just isnt utilized and Donald Lee and Jermichael Finley who are two good TE's Romo 36-17 Rodgers 15-14 enough said forgetting about someone named witten? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChosenOne Posted December 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Spell Aaron right and I'll make my decision. There you go baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 forgetting about someone named witten?Convenient huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Regime Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 (edited) Romo has done nothing but win ever since he took over over as QB. People said he couldnt do anything without TO, yet he is putting up big numbers. The December struggles still continue, but it has nothing to do with his play. He has yet to turn the ball over this month. Rodgers is good, but heplays in a much easier division and has better options at WR. I dont care what people say about Greg Jennings, he hasnt put up big numbers this season but he is still better than Miles Austin and Roy Wiliams. Edited December 20, 2009 by Confidence 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 ID have to say Tony Romo at this point is a better qb than Rodgers. The problem with roders is, he hands onto the ball way to long, a lot of his 48 sacks could have been avoided. Romo only has 28 sacks. And don't go saying rodgers cause romo chokes in the playoffs or come December time, at least romo got his team to the playoffs. I remember a certain fellow who always choked in January, but was amazing during the regular season. He finally got it together for one season, cheated in the sb, but still got the ring to prove it. Romo's time will come. Not saying Rodgers is a bad qb, he is just cheesy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damien Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Romo has done nothing but win ever since he took over over as QB. People said he couldnt do anything without TO, yet he is putting up big numbers. The December struggles still continue, but it has nothing to do with his play. He has yet to turn the ball over this month. Rodgers is good, but heplays in a much easier division and has better options at WR. I dont care what people say about Greg Jennings, he hasnt put up big numbers this season but he is still better than Miles Austin and Roy Wiliams. he's done nothing but win... except in December. 6-10 in December total, 20 INTs. Rogers may have better overall targets, but he has less of a run game, a worse defense (at least when it comes to rushing the passer) and a terrible offensive line. Rogers is younger and has a higher ceiling and thus I'd certainly pick him over inconsistent Romo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 I've always felt that discrediting a player based on the level of his teammates was a weak way of comparing players, and even more so in this case because both of these quarterbacks have their share of weapons. Give me Rodgers. Elite arm, improving mechanics, and best of all, he's consistent. Harp on his flaws (tendency to hold the ball), but he's tough, and the fact that he's been able to deliver all season with that leaky offensive line is mighty impressive. I love Romo's improvisational skills and pocket elusiveness, but he can't carry his offense the way that Rodgers can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reno Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 I've always felt that discrediting a player based on the level of his teammates was a weak way of comparing players, and even more so in this case because both of these quarterbacks have their share of weapons. Give me Rodgers. Elite arm, improving mechanics, and best of all, he's consistent. Harp on his flaws (tendency to hold the ball), but he's tough, and the fact that he's been able to deliver all season with that leaky offensive line is mighty impressive. I love Romo's improvisational skills and pocket elusiveness, but he can't carry his offense the way that Rodgers can. I changed my mind, I am gonna have to agree with you, Rodgers stand alone wise is a better qb. Both are very good, but rodgers has slightly better stats this season with a complete disgrace offensive line, nuff said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Let me just say this isn't a knock against Rodgers either I think he's an excellent quarter back and has amazing accuracy, he just is not as good as Romo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guru Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 ... talk to me when Romo wins a playoff game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papertrail Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 ... talk to me when Romo wins a playoff game. Last time I checked, Romo was able to get his team in the playoffs his first year starting. Rodgers = 6-10. Fail. Rodgers hasn't won a playoff game either, so that argument goes right down the drain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtics3420 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 I'll take Rodgers. He's playing really well despite his terrible offense line play. Someone mentioned Rodgers has gotten sacked 40 something times this year and blaming him for holding the ball too long. Well, when the line barely gives you any time in the pocket, it's hard not to hold onto the ball to avoid throwing a wild pass that could end up being intercepted. I've never liked comparing players with playoff success, so lets please throw that out the window, cause if thats the case then Dan Marino<Ravens QB in 2000(Bollinger right? or am i wrong, someone correct me lol). But yea, Romo is good, but i just think Rodgers is better, give dude a solid O-Line and i bet he can be argued along the lines of Brady/Brees/Manning IMO. Not better than those dudes, but def. on their level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 . Someone mentioned Rodgers has gotten sacked 40 something times this year and blaming him for holding the ball too long. Well, when the line barely gives you any time in the pocket, it's hard not to hold onto the ball to avoid throwing a wild pass that could end up being intercepted. Apparently you haven't watched a lot of the Packers games because on about 1/3 of his sacks he has really good protection he just doesn't throw the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lkr Posted December 20, 2009 Report Share Posted December 20, 2009 Apparently you haven't watched a lot of the Packers games because on about 1/3 of his sacks he has really good protection he just doesn't throw the ball.He has no one open, he's trying to make a play. And 1/3rd is waaay too high, more like 1/5th of the time. And you can't blame Rodgers missing the playoffs last year, he put his team ahead at the end of every game, and then the defense blew it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.