EastCoastNiner

https://www.facebook.com/NDFootball/posts/553537038009180 Righttttttt..........

Brian Hamilton ********@ChiTribHamilton So #NotreDame confirms @Deadspin report that Lennay Kekua never existed, but claims Manti Te'o was among those duped. Child, please!

"@JohnKincade: Claims that Te'o actually played in the BCS Title Game this year also can't be verified by the Alabama players." http://1-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/sp/image/1339/52/1339523911435.gif Notre Dame is apparently about to release a statement.

From another site: Cliffs: -No record of death, funeral, or obituaries -No record of auto accident -No record of a "Lennay Kekua" attending Stanford -Photographs used by media were actually of another woman who does not know Manti Not to mention a few beat writers from ND are now saying there was never even a mention of him having a girlfriend before her "death". Up until recently, the girl from California had no clue her pictures were being used as Te'o's "girlfriend". This all seems too weird........

Oh, lawwwwdddd. If true................ :o . http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-is-a-hoax

I'll respond to most of this later, but quickly address the one question you were asking. Yes, I face the potential threat of begin robbed, assaulted, killed, etc. everyday. Police officers face those same threats as well. Just because I'm not "chasing around criminals" doesn't mean that I'm not a potential target for one.

Hey, liberals, explain something to me. If you think this ban and executive orders are going to do anything, why didn't that stop the Columbine shooting? Herp to the derp.

Right, lets focus on incidents that don't happen nearly as often as other more common and deadly incidents. Makes sense. Can you please explain to me what constitutes an assault riffle? I'll let you google it because I know you're a typical Obama nut-hugging sheep that actually has no clue what it is.

http://truthinreligionandpolitics.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/more_people_killed_with_hammers_than_rifles.jpg?w=250&h=300 And, no, I'm not saying bad hammers, but people like to exaggerate the amount of deaths by "assault weapons".

Well, since you always love to overlook facts and what's actually happening, let me help you. The last ban did absolutely NOTHING. Nothing at all. Please, find me something credible that states otherwise. We have the right to bear arms, to protect ourselves from our government, and protect our well-being. I hope you don't have multiple people break into your house one day and pop you ten times in the chest because you didn't have a gun or couldn't hold enough bullets in it. Do you mind telling me how long most democracies/republics last? You're so keen on believing that no country can be overtaken or turned upside down.

How can you support and "assault weapons" ban when the last one failed so miserably? There's no link between assault weapons ban and lower crime. Not one inclination of that. http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/01/18/levy.anti.gun.control/index.html Oh, the term "assault weapon" must mean those guns are soooooo scary. Most of you have no clue what classifies and assault weapon.

How this guy got elected twice is unbelievable. Unreal, always overstepping his constitutional boundaries. "Oh, I don't want people having guns around children...........just my children because they're more important". I can't believe a lot of you voted for this moron. http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/16/politics/gun-laws-battle/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

The fans pay to see a TEAM. Go ahead and make your argument that they go to see certain players, but at the end of the day, it was a SPURS and HEAT game. The Spurs almost won that game, so there is absolutely no basis to these frivolous claims this idiot is making. None whatsoever. The mindset he has and the one you are using right now is what's hurting our country. There is legitimately no rational basis to suing a team that won it's [expletive]ing game. The ticket doesn't say you're going to see Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili. It says you're going to see the Spurs and Heat. Period. Edit: If you were him, would you be suing, yes or no? I'm not asking whether or not you understand his position, but whether or not you would join his lawsuit.

Cool, it wasn't a Spurs home game. There's no need to be suing them or the Heat. Try again.

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/66482_10151546173979505_1185755160_n.jpg

Oh, yeeeahh nikka. Muh boi n i be dominion at Madden. Dawg, I ken lite da score up on ya azz cuz. Yeeea son, lemme tri n act all hood. Sound familiar?

You quit you idiot.

Right. I go to a movie and don't like, but want to sue because the trailers for the movie looks good. I go to a football game, billed as a battle of two offensive power houses, and it ends up being a low scoring game. I want my money back for false advertising. Please.

I agree with Stephan A. Smith that Armstrong should suffer a lot for what he has done to other people's lives. He's a fraud and a piece of crap. He should suffer a lot.

Not a chance. They're reverting back to the Knicks everyone knows, which is a losing team.

Right, all you do is stick a needle in your body and you're suddenly amazing. Yep, it's that simple! .

Where are the Armstrong nut huggers at? http://www.discusshoops.com/forums/topic/30969-usada-lance-to-get-life-ban-lose-7-titles/page__hl__lance Inb4 they claim they aren't wrong because they "technically were right" about what they were saying or some other garbage. .

Sherman exposed as not being able to hang with the big boys today.

This is the part that the vast majority of people don't seem to understand. There's two "live strong" organizations, and the one that people donate to is virtually a scam by Armstrong. Very little of the money given to his organization actually goes to cancer research. He's a fraud and a loser.

Oh, but Manning is the OC too right? He calls every play, right? Not you in particular, but I love the hypocrisy with Manning jockers. They always say he makes all of the calls on his own, yet when something goes wrong, it's not on him.