fly3rs18

i dont need any facts to explain that he is 37 years old and at the end of his career..... and btw, we have hockey on TV 24/7 too. you are no better then anyone else

haha. its the last all-star game ever, it should have been at a better place

leighton today > osgood today osgood a few years ago > leighton today i have said this so many times over and over again

ok. i didnt have many other options to defend myself after being called stupid and him saying that no one else knows what they are talking about. its nothing new

i dont know of any, there are definitely a bunch around though

as i said, the ONLY reason why i would take osgood over leighton RIGHT NOW is that osgood is 37 years old. there are absolutely no other reasons. if it was osgood of a few years ago vs leighton now then i would take osgood

you have given 1 stat, his GAA in the finals. that doesnt represent anything. that just means the detroit defense was better then the flyers defense. not that osgood is better then leighton

absolutely. me and phightins have said that many times. but osgood is just as much of a product of the system late in his career on detroit. it was the same thing. and the reason that id rather have leighton is that osgood is 37 years old, no other reason

it shouldnt be even close, but there are those dumbass animal groups that value animals way more then they should

no, you said i knew nothing and to try to learn. so i brought up my life compared to your life (or lack of). completely related.

nice changing of the topic there. i was talking about your bull[expletive] major and you are failing at life

learn something? what school and what are you majoring in again? oh yeah, a completely bull[expletive] major. lemme know when you learn something

haha nice

what??? stop trying to bait. i am talking about the announcers voice, nothing else. gtfo

thanks for the useless stats. good to see you have nothing better to do

you make it seem like those low scoring teams are horrible teams. there is a reason why those low scoring teams like boston and montreal beat those high scoring teams like the caps. chicago beat us, because yes they are a great scoring team, but they also have one of the top defensive units in the league. and thier defense was just as much, if not more of a reason of why they won the stanley cup

in response to adam burrish's dumbass comments: "Why is he worrying about me instead of celebrating winning the Cup? Boy, it just goes to show how much I was in his kitchen for him to be talking about me five minutes after he wins the Cup. I could care less what somebody on another team says about me. I don't play this game to make friends. I play to win." ~ Chris Pronger

yeah i know. its pretty funny

call dell, hp, or whatever brand you have. thats probably the best option.

what??? hamels is getting much better, but halladay is absolutely not slowing down in any way

wow those annoucers are horrible. 1 minute of it and i never want to hear him again, i cant imagine watching a full game with those guys

^^^hahahaha. very true so if leighton isnt clutch at all then how do you explain the entire playoffs up to the finals, where leighton had to be incredibly clutch to come back against boston, and then completely shut down the montreal offense? leighton didnt have a good finals, and that is mostly because the flyers D didnt have a good finals either

you and your boys?

so you are 22 and have never ordered anything online? or pay any bills online? or anything like that. they can go through your email too

there is a big difference between now and 15 years ago. viruses and trojans now can track every single key you type and automatically send it to someone over the internet. so this means someone can steal your emails, online bank accounts, credit card info from ordering online, and much more. im glad you can just "accept it", but its only a matter of time until it bites you in the [expletive]