His Greatness Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 (edited) I think this one is pretty obvious, but have fun with it. EDIT: Added poll. Edited July 21, 2009 by His Greatness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Who do you think it is Mason? I remember when me and The Legend would go all out in these debates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great iBoldin Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Took Biedrins. I find him to be less of a liability on defense and less of a distraction/injury prone player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
His Greatness Posted July 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Who do you think it is Mason? I remember when me and The Legend would go all out in these debates. I won't say because I don't want to sway any of the votes. Seems to be the norm here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Goods Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Took Biedrins. I find him to be less of a liability on defense and less of a distraction/injury prone player. Andrew Bynum doesn't cause distraction, and I don't think injury prone is having two people crash into your leg. Bynum is still young and has alot of potential, he should make the WCF all star team this year with Shaq headed to the East and Yao injured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Feelgood Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 So is Greg Oden not injury prone because he stepped on Bynum's ankle and smashed knees with Maggette? Come on man, Bynum is injury prone as much as Oden is injury prone. This is pretty much offense VS defense, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Biedrins because he's not as injury prone, more effective on defense, and wont call for the ball that much in which I'd be able to give the ball to my star player(s) but would still look for him on open cuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legacy Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 This ain't fair until we get a coach that actually knows how to use big men who can't shoot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owner Real Deal Posted July 21, 2009 Owner Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Don't factor in the injuries, and it's Bynum. He's a far superior offensive player, and almost as good defensively. But if we're talking right now, injuries considered, it's Biedrins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Multi-Billionaire Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Bynum... but if he gets injured again any part of his leg, I'm hopping onto Biedrins' wagon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erick Blasco Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 I think Bynum has the goods to be an elite center. Biedrins is mostly a hard-working, overachieving rebounder and shot blocker (not that there's anything wrong with that). But Biedrins is still very average offensively and isn't a great one-on-one defender. Bynum didn't look completely healthy during the postseason last year and is still so young. If he gets over his injury woes and grows up, he can be a top-3 center in this league. That's why I take him over Biedrins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moeroadkill Posted July 22, 2009 Report Share Posted July 22, 2009 why is other there? i would rather have a player like bynum on my team for long term purposes. as stated before if he can stay healthy he could be the better centers in the league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.