Warren2ThaG Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Can't wait till the Giants visit Qwest Field, it's gonna be on baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomarFachix Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Maybe we have different standards, but if I had 4 drives with the average starting field position of the opponents 31.5 yard line, I wouldn't call 13 points a great success. If you want to discredit the drive Kitna came in, it's 3 drives with the average starting field position of the Giants 27.6 yard line and 10 points. Either way... not impressed. But his numbers look good I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guru Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Then why are we bringing up yardage? They didn't have to go anywhere on 3 on 4 of Romo's drives that's why they didn't get a lot of yardage. ROMO WAS 5 OF 7 39 YARDS 1 TD, THE 2 INCOMPLETIONS? ON TARGET DROPS TO MILES AUSTIN, ROMO WOULD HAVE SCORCHED THE GIANTS DHahahahaha. The point was that they only scored one TD with less than thirty yards to start off with. Is that really that hard to get through your head? You are starting to sound a lot like this guy right now:http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2262/2192148024_688d0eb741_o.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Hahahahaha. The point was that they only scored one TD with less than thirty yards to start off with. Is that really that hard to get through your head? You are starting to sound a lot like this guy right now:http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2262/2192148024_688d0eb741_o.gifhttp://forum.i3d.net/attachments/offtopic-english/943182047d1249721477-happy-birthday-frank-facepalm.jpg Really? If you are just going to ignore what I say theres no point in talking to you. God I've had better arguments with a wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guru Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 http://forum.i3d.net/attachments/offtopic-english/943182047d1249721477-happy-birthday-frank-facepalm.jpg Really? If you are just going to ignore what I say theres no point in talking to you. God I've had better arguments with a wall.What point? That Romo was 5-7 with two drops? Who gives a [expletive]? He should of led the offense to more than 1 TD with that field position. I ignored what you said because it is a completely irrelevant point considering you guys still struggled to move the ball with Romo at QB. And gtfo with that "well if Romo was playing we would have won" bull[expletive]. We started playing lazy as hell because we went up by 18, if you didn't notice that you are either blind or stupid. Pick one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fish7718 Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 What point? That Romo was 5-7 with two drops? Who gives a [expletive]? He should of led the offense to more than 1 TD with that field position. I ignored what you said because it is a completely irrelevant point considering you guys still struggled to move the ball with Romo at QB. And gtfo with that "well if Romo was playing we would have won" bull[expletive]. We started playing lazy as hell because we went up by 18, if you didn't notice that you are either blind or stupid. Pick one. Yeah because you could tell the Cowboys defense was real into the game after Romo got injured. Yes losing your starting QB can be the main reason for you to lose a game if you didn't know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guru Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 Yeah because you could tell the Cowboys defense was real into the game after Romo got injured. Yes losing your starting QB can be the main reason for you to lose a game if you didn't know. Yes, losing you starting QB can cause you to lose the game. But to say you would have won with him is a [expletive]ing injudicious way of thinking. And if your defense is really that effected by the QUARTERBACK getting injured, there is something wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUBucksfan09 Posted October 28, 2010 Report Share Posted October 28, 2010 With out without Romo, our defense was on the field way too long, got tired and got worn down big time.Romo going down though means season is over for the cowboys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.