EastCoastNiner

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6BUbdtFldQ You can call it wutcha wanna but imma call it wut it iz!

A.I. by a mile.

Chris Pronger signed a 7 year extension.......

Here is an NHL 10' gameplay video, and I am telling you that this game is going to be absolutely amazing!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_sLG7fUB4&feature=haxa_popt00us0f

You sure it's not your sister? She looks like she's sort of a red-head.

You should PM me the forum, and I wouldn't try and get in contact with him because he may tell the owner so the owner doesn't get mad at him.

Just PM Brandon. Also, I know he may have done it to make it look like he's a baseball fan, but I am making a thread on a baseball forum to see if anyone else knows where this kid may post, so maybe we can find the site out that way. However, there are probably multiple people with that username because it would just be like "Bryan24" or "Jordan23".

- Deion Branch is not the same caliber WR that Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne are/were. - You can't be that stupid with the whole rings argument because it is used to compare players with SIMILAR caliber. - I guarantee you would mention Michael Jordan's rings when calling about him. - The Colts defense was not bad, so please go look up the stats.

I'm not making an excuse for Jason Bay. He has one less HR, and is leading the AL in RBI's, and it would be impossible to leave him off the team. Also, there aren't too many people that are as worthy as Jason Bay of the spot for the OF, not 2B. I don't think Dustin Pedroia should be starting, but I don't think Ian Kinsler's case is real strong the the All-Star game. I brought up Jason Bay because I knew someone would bring up his .BA, and I am merely saying that his other stats make up for it, along with the fact that he plays LF, and not 2B.

I don't see the reason you guys would vote for Ian Kinsler. I would understand if you voted for him last year, but a .253 BA is not that good, and yes, I am aware of Jason Bay's BA, but he has been in a slump along with the rest of the team, but is still among the AL leaders in HR's and RBI's.

I still think that Tony Parker has the best "tear drop" shot in the NBA, but CP3 has a very nice one as well. Deron Williams is not just a little bit strong, but he is a LOT stronger, and it's like that compared to most PG's in the NBA, so it's not just CP3. You are correct about the ability to throw the ally-oop, but I think you just watch a lot more of CP3 and don't really see Deron Williams enough to know how good of a passer he is, regardless of the little differential in stats. I would take Deron Williams on my team, and one of the main reasons is because I think his shooting ability is far superior to CP3. I know someone will try and mention the Rajon Rondo v.s. Devin Harris comparision because of the last comment, but as shown, Rajon Rondo is not that far behind Devin Harris in shooting.

Deron Williams, and I have said this for a long, long time. Deron Williams also owns CP3 is their match-ups. Deron Williams is: - The better shooter - Stonger - Equal passer CP3 is a better defender, although many people get caught up in his steals stats and give him more credit than her deserves, but I don't really care about that, but Deron Williams isn't a poor defender by any stretch. Also, many people underestimate the passing abilities of Deron Williams because they have seen CP3 make a lot of flashy plays, but Deron Williams is right up there with CP3 in terms of passing.

Terrible response considering I have provided many reasons.

I love how you added something to this thread. There are about 3-4 people that have actually provided any legitimate reasons in this thread, and you are not one of them.

A lot of this stuff you had pretty much mentioned before, and some of the stuff I agree with, so I'm not gonig to comment on the whole thing because we are just going to go back and forth. However, I just a few things to say: - The part where I said Kobe Bryant was a better defender, I probably thought he was when I was typing because I was writing the rest of my argument about Michael Jordan, and he is probably not a better defender, and I have given Michael Jordan credit for his defense in his early years. - Why do you keep talking about Michael Jordan being rusty when I have already told you that the two seasons people have said he was "rusty" in, he dropped 63 and 55? That is not rusty, plain and simple, any way you put it. - You mention that Kareem Abdul Jabar had not been as good as he used to and that the Lakers were better off with Same Perkins and Vlade Divac, but you forget to mention Michael Cooper, who was the Lakers defensive stopper, and had retired the year before. Seriously, are going tell me that if Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol are out for the NBA Finals and the Cavs beat them, with Andrew Bynum and Sasha Vujacic filling in for them that they are the same team? - Also, I didn't mean to say that the Boston Celtics lost 15 more games when Larry Bird retired, but rather lost 15 more games the season that he only played 6 games in.

Most of the points you made here I adressed in the previous paragraphs that I wrote. If you want me to adress any of these points, tell me, and I will. Also, I just want to know how the Chicago Bulls only lost two more games the season after Michael Jordan first retired. And, yes, I am aware that the Chicago Bulls did not win the "Championship. Also, just to compare Michael Jordan to other great players that have retired, these are the win differentials in the teams that lost their best player: Bill Russel- 14 less wins Wilt Chamberlain- 13 Oscar Robertson- 21 Larry Bird- 15 Magic Johnson- 15 Michael Jordan- 2 Also, not all of those teams made the playoffs, but out of the teams that did, the Chicago Bulls had the best record out of any of the teams.

I'm afraid someone is going to try and chop off my 12 inch donger so they can have it, and I might die from blood loss. .

I agree. .

I think that the records of teams nowadays is indicative of more balance throughout the NBA. Also, the Seattle Sonics then were like the Dallas Mavericks of today in the sense that they had good regular season records, but were not really good in the playoffs, altough they did make the NBA Finals and WCF. Also, I'd like to add that the were the #1 seed and lost to the #8 seed during the 1994 playoffs. Also, I do not think that the Pacers, Sixers, and Nets were really good teams either, so I am not disagreeing with that. Again, "Gil Zero", you have been doing the same thing in every post, where you make a claim that you can't support, and then call me stubborn and [expletive] like that. Please, find me where I made the comments you were referring to.

Screamo music is TERRRRRIIIBBBLLLEEE!!!

I never said that. . Find me EXACTLY where I said that it was unfair because Michael Jordan had better teammates. Well, you won't because I never said that, and you still haven't provided anything besides the lists of stats.

I'm not underestimating Shaq, and I'm sure many people here would tell you that I really like Shaq. He would be my 1st over-all pick for a "Franchise" if I had the chance, so there is no way I underestimate him. Yes, making the playoffs every single season is damn impressive, but I want you to look up the record of the Chicago Bulls for Michael Jordan in his first three seasons, and those records would not get you close to the playoffs today.. Also, the Celtics and Pistons were on the decline when Michael Jordan actually started winning "Championships". Karl Malone and John Stockton are two of my favorite players, but the Utah Jazz team as a whole was not as good as people think they were, Also, the Orlando Magic beat a Boston Celtics team with two HOFER's playing this season, but that doesn't mean they are a great team. Also, thank you for actually giving reasons unlike "Gil Zero" who doesn't add anything because he knows absolutely nothing, and has yet to provide anything other than a list of stats. .

I hate when people use the excuse that he didn't play a full season when he was scored 55+ in the playoffs. It makes absolutely no sense. Also, Kobe Bryant has been fortunate to have good "Big Men", but he has still done more with less compared to Michael Jordan when he didn't have his "Championship" talent.

I don't think I was the person who said that, but your statement about Kobe Bryant being selfish before Shaq entered the picture makes no sense considering they joined the Lakers around the same time, and Kobe didn't really start until his third season with the Lakers.